10-Q/K Tweeting

August 30th, 2010 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor

As Google joins Bing and others in upping the capability of its real-time searching – to provide better insight into trending stories on Facebook, Twitter etc. – I wonder whether now is the time for the S.E.C. to add a Twitter feed to its existing RSS feed. Or maybe there is one and I just missed it? Read the rest of this entry »




Another Brick in the (XBRL) Wall?

August 19th, 2010 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor

Far be it for me to mock efforts to generate XBRL innovation but even I was surprised by the breathless intensity of the Brix Project – a new iPhone app for delivering ‘aha’ moments from XBRL filing data by literally delivering it into your hands. I can see it now. A killer chat up line. Here’s the script: Read the rest of this entry »




RaaS or a teaspoon of SUGAR….

August 19th, 2010 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor

Watching ‘Mary Poppins’ and the delectable Julie Andrews administering that spoonful of sugar somehow reminded me of the S.E.C. and of one of the future directions in corporate reporting – namely RaaS or Reporting as a Service. And before you switch off, I don’t mean delivering reporting functionality as an online SaaS application – we already do that. I mean RaaS. Read the rest of this entry »




If You Support Transparency – Support the Bill

August 12th, 2010 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor

H.R. 6038 or The Financial Transparency Act of 2010 was proposed by House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Ranking Member Darrell Issa (R-CA) on July 30th. It’s a bill that deserves the support of anyone who believes that greater transparency of financial information is one way of helping to prevent the financial failures of the past and maybe even surface the financial opportunities of the future.

By mandating the adoption of consistent data standards for information that regulators are already collecting from public companies, banks, exchanges, and other market actors, this bill will move the whole industry toward unprecedented transparency and liquidity.  Crowd-sourced oversight by analysts, media, watchdog groups, and the public, Mr. Issa believes, is the best hope for averting and mitigating future financial crises.

‘Crowd-sourced oversight’ certainly has the potential to be a powerful force for ‘averting and mitigating future financial crises’. And to enable this, the bill rightly emphasizes the importance and need for the use of  ‘data standards’ by a number of Government agencies, by which is meant:

(b) Characteristics Of Financial Data Standards.—The data standards required by subsection (a) shall, to the extent practicable—

“(1) incorporate widely accepted, nonproprietary, searchable, computer readable data formats;

“(2) be consistent with and implement—

“(A) United States generally accepted accounting principles or Federal financial accounting standards (as appropriate);

“(B) demonstrated best practices; and

“(C) Federal regulatory requirements;

“(3) improve the transparency, consistency, and usability of business and financial information;

“(4) ensure interoperability and appropriate reuse of information;

“(5) reuse, enhance, harmonize, and integrate existing standards as possible and appropriate;

“(6) be capable of being continually upgraded to be of maximum use as technologies and content evolve over time; and

“(7) be consistent and interoperable with one another.

Now who can quibble with that? Stop being blindsided by information opacity and support the bill. And anyway, Rep. Issa is one of the few officials around who has a POGO award.




Document vs. Data-Centric Design

August 11th, 2010 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor

Documents are so flexible aren’t they? You can mix text and numbers, tables and charts – all within the same page context. You can even spend lots of time making a page look aesthetically pleasing and make the information enticing. To an individual human reader, a single well-designed page can communicate a lot of information very effectively.

But what if you want to communicate data to many different information consumers with different interests in the data? What if your focus is not a single human ‘page reader’ but the rapidly expanding universe of online web services that ‘consume’ data programmatically to make it easier for any human information consumer to crowdsource and crowdshare and compare and contrast the data?

That’s when document-centric information design falls down in comparison to data-centric design. To illustrate why, I’ll examine the Global Reporting Initiative’s NGO Sector Supplement Economic Indicator NG08 as an example. Read the rest of this entry »




Indicator or Indicative?

August 9th, 2010 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor

As I gradually become more aware of all the various sets of sustainability reporting indicators out there, I wonder if there isn’t a little confusion as to what an ‘indicator’ or ‘metric’ actually is in a sustainability context. Are we in fact talking about indicators when we mean evidence? Read the rest of this entry »




Silos are for grain storage

August 9th, 2010 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor

Over at framework:cr, CEO Kathee Rebernak’s bio includes this snippet:

everything is connected (silos are for grain storage)

I agree with Kathee. And much of the talk about ‘integrating’ financial and sustainability data is basically about helping to put two silos side by side rather than creating new kinds of reporting contexts to enable a more holistic view of the linkage between an organization’s behaviour and performance. So let’s create a new reporting context for water… Read the rest of this entry »




For Reporting to Work You Have to Report

August 5th, 2010 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor

I’ve been spending some time recently doing a little analysis of online GRI reporting, which has involved looking at their indicator sets and how these are reported by organizations. This led me to BP and MM12 and the need to re-emphasize that for reporting to work you have to report… Read the rest of this entry »




Here We Go Again…

August 4th, 2010 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor

SmartPlanet did an article on SAP’s sustainability-related acquisitions back in April and in it, AMR Research analyst Steven Stokes was quoted as saying:

But what’s most frightening, Stokes said, is that many companies’ solution for sustainability is powered by a rather unsophisticated tool: Microsoft Excel.

“Just 7 percent of Fortune 1000 companies say they’re reporting [carbon footprint data] and find it easy to do so,” Stokes said.

It appears that with sustainability reporting, as with virtually all other kinds of corporate reporting, we are once again in danger of a new kind of spreadsheet hell. What’s needed is a data standard for sustainability, which is why it is surprising that the newly convened IIRC does not seem to have XBRL on its radar.

Surely this time around we have a chance to do it differently?

The way of doing things in the past was develop a content/concept standard first then, almost as an afterthought, develop a data standard to support it. This is a redundant, pre-Internet way of thinking. It’s an approach that fails to recognize that dissemination of data is what democratizes information. Today content standards should be developed in tandem with data standards so that as soon as a concept is defined you can also implement it in an agreed way at the data storage level.

It’s simple really. Developing a content standard without a data standard is like developing a corporate strategy without the tactics to execute it. The strategy looks great on paper but on the ground it’s just words not action. Strategy is executed via tactics; content standards are executed via data standards.

Developing content and data standards together as a ‘joined-up’ effort ensures that any kind of standard hits the start line running by being more powerful and useful from the get-go and that it can be adopted, disseminated and leveraged at Internet speed not at a snails pace. After all who wants to wait until 2020 for a global reporting standard?




Integrated vs. Connected vs. Holistic Reporting

August 3rd, 2010 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor

In an effort to try to provide better transparency into the various terms describing ‘new’ kinds of corporate reporting, I’ll explain the differences between integrated, connected and holistic reporting. This is a rather long post so I suggest a shot of Red Bull, Maté, snuff or some other stimulant before you start. Read the rest of this entry »