|
|
February 24th, 2011 by Rivet Software
“We are the industry leader!” “We have the highest accuracy in our filings!” Sound familiar? Most XBRL solution providers boast stats about their growth, accuracy, and sheer volume of XBRL filings they prepare, but you know how high the stakes are for you and your company. Filing errors, amendments, and public embarrassment can be avoided by selecting an XBRL partner you can trust, but how do you determine which provider that is?
- Which XBRL solution provider has filed the most XBRL filings?
- Who in the industry files the most accurate filings?
- Who has filed the most filing errors? Which XBRL provider has filed the most amendments?
In 30 minutes, we’ll show you how to use free tools available to you online so that you can answer these questions for yourself, with confidence, without having to rely on a vendor or 3rd party analysis.
Title: Conducting Your Own Competitive Analysis
Date: Thursday, March 3, 2011
Time: 3:00 PM – 3:30 PM ET
Register >
We are looking forward to seeing you there!
Tags: webinar Posted in Compliance, Solutions, XBRL | No Comments »
February 24th, 2011 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor
There have been a couple of related items posted recently that I’d like to briefly respond to. The first is a blog post by Mike Willis on The New Math for Transparency and the second is the tweeted assertion by Daniel Roberts that Until the SEC (and others) can clearly show the value of #XBRL Detailed Tagging to the producing company, only the Consultants will win. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Communication, Transparency, XBRL | 1 Comment »
February 23rd, 2011 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor
The Booz & Co perspective paper The Rise of Generation C is well worth a skim to consider its implications for financial reporting and financial information transparency generally.
Just what will it mean to the management and communication of financial content when the next generation of financial information consumers are ‘on the grid 24/7′ and ‘social animals’ and when ‘nonlinear information consumption’ is the norm and the ‘benefits of transparency are seen to outweigh the risks’?
These implications are why it will become increasingly meaningless to consider financial information as somehow ‘privileged’ in any way; rather than as just another form of content that can be shared, enhanced, combined and generally crowdsourced just like any other kind of ‘idea’ in order to add value.
The key step to take is to think of a financial statement not as some kind of fixed ‘report’ but as an idea that has potential and possibilities for innovation. The kind of shift that views a balance sheet not as a fixed presentation of assets, liabilities and equity but as one of many corporate information ‘sandboxes’ that can be crowdsourced for business model improvement.
Posted in Communication, Transparency | 2 Comments »
February 21st, 2011 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor
Remember the movie The Graduate?
I want to say one word to you. Just one word.
Yes, sir.
Are you listening?
Yes, I am.
Mashups.
Just how do you mean that, sir?
Actually Mr. McGuire said ‘plastics’ but my point is that ‘mashups’ was the word that came to mind as I read the Financial Reporting Model Task Force report to the FASAB. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Analytics, Communication, XBRL | No Comments »
February 10th, 2011 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor
In the MITSloan Management Review report – Sustainability: The Embracers Sieze Advantage - the authors claim that:
…the new era of accountability means measurement and reporting of companies’ environmental and social impact will take on greater prominence.
So in the sustainability reporting ‘E’ Quadrant where exactly is your business? Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Sustainability | No Comments »
February 10th, 2011 by Jordan Woodard - Senior Compliance Manager
In my last Blog post about the 2011 taxonomy I explained how Rivet is preparing to support the changes from the old 2009 taxonomy to the new 2011 taxonomy. We have built our platform using the draft version of the 2011 taxonomy and are currently laying in the updated taxonomy that was delivered to the SEC On January 17th. The 2011 taxonomy has changed quite a bit from the draft version to the more finalized version delivered to the SEC, a summary of the change includes:
- 3000 definition changes remained about the same as in the version delivered to the SEC
- 2500 Data type changes in the taxonomy delivered to the SEC Read the rest of this entry »
Tags: FAF, GAAP, Taxonomy, XBRL Posted in Taxonomies | 1 Comment »
February 9th, 2011 by Patrick Quinlan - CEO - (2010 to 2011)
Concern has been circulating regarding the ability and readiness of public companies and service providers to meet the SEC’s XBRL filing requirements for first time Wave 3 filers and Wave 2 filers expanding their XBRL filings from block note tagging to detail footnote tagging. Dominic Jones of the IR Web Report published an article highlighting the grievances that have been voiced, perhaps most notably by The Committee on Corporate Reporting (CCR) of Financial Executives International (FEI). In a letter written by the CCR to SEC chair Mary Shapiro, the committee calls for a grace period to allow filing companies to submit XBRL files up to one week after filing their 10-Qs and 10-Ks as well as an extension on limited liability due to insufficient tools available to review XBRL files before submission.
Respectfully, we disagree. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Uncategorized, XBRL | 1 Comment »
February 3rd, 2011 by Brooke Keith - Channel Partnership Operations Specialist
When Hollywood scriptwriters pitch their movie ideas to studio executives, it’s common practice to draw on the familiar in order to quickly and effectively describe the next mega blockbuster. In the financial world, XRBL is no doubt the next big thing. To draw on the above reference, the future of XBRL is like Wall Street meets the DaVinci Code. With that visual, my mind goes to Michael Douglas and Tom Hanks feverously tagging financials, saving the world, all the while questioning current financial dogma and redeeming the Gordon Gecko’s of the world, one XBRL element at a time. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Partners, XBRL | 1 Comment »
February 1st, 2011 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor
Private Market Networks (PMNs), as discussed in the Strategy & Business article The New Financial Matchmakers, look like a perfect use case for the use of an XBRL taxonomy as a foundation for the data provided to an exchange by buyers and sellers. Check the author’s conclusion:
If government officials around the world allow this new global network to multiply the natural power of capitalism, if the requisite levels of transparency and trustworthiness are fostered in the design of these systems, and if business leaders and investors recognize the value of more direct interaction, then the new networks for allocating capital will rapidly take their place alongside more established exchanges — and could even begin to displace them.
Using an open XBRL taxonomy would provide the ‘requisite level of transparency’ these exchanges need at a stroke. And power new and more open kinds of trading analytics. Yet XBRL is not even mentioned in the article. Bizarre.
Tags: PMN Posted in Investors, Transparency, XBRL | 1 Comment »
February 1st, 2011 by Stewart McKie - Executive Advisor
I’m glad to see the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) is starting to invest in evangelizing its sustainability reporting framework in the USA with their Focal Point USA initiative. Apparently on Jan. 31 in New York (well-known home of sustainability reporting):
‘Movers, shakers and report makers’ will gather at the New York Stock Exchange for a breakfast event and panel discussion to answer the question “Why is America letting the world lead in sustainability reporting?”
A question that will no doubt puzzle organizations such as Patagonia, Timberland, B Corporations and many others in the USA who are innovating in the area of sustainability reporting without the use of prescriptive frameworks.
If you have no idea what I’m talking about, check out this introductory white paper I wrote back in mid-2010: Sustainability Reporting: Definition, Directions and Challenges.
Read the rest of this entry »
Tags: GRI Posted in Sustainability, Taxonomies, Transparency | 1 Comment »
|