<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reporting: Back to Basics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rivetsoftware.com/2009/08/26/reporting-back-to-basics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rivetsoftware.com/2009/08/26/reporting-back-to-basics/</link>
	<description>Comply. Control. Communicate.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:29:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miles Jennings</title>
		<link>http://blog.rivetsoftware.com/2009/08/26/reporting-back-to-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rivetsoftware.com/?p=543#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Your reference to the Back to Basics is a nice take.  I&#039;ve reviewed your CrossView and I like it.  It is a Clean Machine...definitely.

The only problem I see is the dearth of data (understandable due to filing phase-in).  It will be 3 years before you start building the full database and then you will not have historic.  I have mentioned to Emily that you might want to consider incorporating a feature regarding pools of securities (my web tool will be available on Sept. 7th or so at the website above).

But don&#039;t think this is just a pitch.  I am also reviewing my site with these 4 back to basics ideas in mind.  And thank you for your comments.

Miles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your reference to the Back to Basics is a nice take.  I&#8217;ve reviewed your CrossView and I like it.  It is a Clean Machine&#8230;definitely.</p>
<p>The only problem I see is the dearth of data (understandable due to filing phase-in).  It will be 3 years before you start building the full database and then you will not have historic.  I have mentioned to Emily that you might want to consider incorporating a feature regarding pools of securities (my web tool will be available on Sept. 7th or so at the website above).</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t think this is just a pitch.  I am also reviewing my site with these 4 back to basics ideas in mind.  And thank you for your comments.</p>
<p>Miles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
